Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation
Top

Are you one of the ‘genetically advanced’ four-hours-a-night sleepers?

audrey.JPG

Those who can get by on less than five hours of sleep have been found to carry a special gene, which experts believe negates the effects of sleep deprivation.

Ying-Hui Fu, a sleep researcher at University of California, says that those who carry the rare DEC2 gene appear to have a ‘resistance’ against the health risks which normally come with too little sleep.

“My lab uses human genetics to gain a better understanding on this topic,” she writes on Reddit. “We’ve found that sleep behaviour is heavily influenced by our genetic makeup.”

“Just like many other traits - height, weight, body shape - sleep behaviour is at least partly inherited. We discovered a mutation in the DEC2 gene that allows some people to sleep only four to six hours a night and feel completely refreshed.”

Though getting too little sleep is thought to heighten the risk of cardiovascular diseases and impaired brain function, Fu believes that the gene changes a person’s typical circadian rhythm – our natural body clock.

Getting to much sleep, in fact has the opposite effect on these people, who are left feeling groggy and out of sorts by the recommended eight hours.

Woman sleeping

Answering questions about her research on Reddit, Fu says: “From what we can tell and from what they told us, these short sleepers are pretty energetic. And we believe that they feel refreshed [after just a few hours’ sleep] since they can go on all day and be active.”

“We have not seen any health problems associated with these people. Some of our research subjects are in their 90s. On the flip side, these natural short sleepers feel, in their own words, ‘awful’ if they sleep more.”

Since there’s currently no test available for people to discover whether they do indeed have the DEC2 gene, Fu suggests listening to your body to determine just how much sleep you really need.

“The best way [to establish how much sleep you need] is to listen to your body and figure out what is the best schedule and duration for yourself.”

“For example, when you are on vacation and have no social responsibilities and no other external influences, what is your body telling you to do and how do you feel? What makes you feel the best most of the day? Although that may sound primitive, it’s still the most accurate way.”

She also encourages people to step away from sleep monitoring apps and technology, branding them largely useless.

Alarm clock

“Today’s popular wearables can only measure movement and maybe heart rate. They cannot tell you anything about the quality of your sleep,” she notes.

“To really know the quality of sleep, we have to be able to measure EEG (electroencephalogram) during sleep. Most EEG devices are difficult to use and expensive.”

So is there a quick fix to getting by on less sleep if you’re not a carrier of the super gene? According to Fu, no. And experimentation isn’t worth the health risk.

“I was one of the people who hated sleep and tried everything there was to sleep less before I started this research. Now, I wish I never messed with my sleep in my younger years.

“From what I know, it is not worth it. It will increase your chance of having health problems later on and it definitely will affect your mental vigilance.”

 

Related

woman sleeping at office work desk.jpg

Science agrees that 9am starts are torture

rexfeatures_5012161cx.jpg

Amber Rose turns the table on slut-shaming in hilarious new video

5988-062080-rt.jpg

This new classical album could cure your insomnia

101 dalmatians engagement shoot.jpg

Couple celebrates engagement with 101 Dalmatians photoshoot

yyy.jpg

The most beautiful and stylish small bedrooms

rexfeatures_4110557a.jpg

Facebook announces "dislike" style button is coming soon

book in sunset field.jpg

The Man Booker Prize shortlist is here

steven momks wedding - gift of a wedding - steve grogan photography.jpg

Strangers fund couple’s wedding after groom is diagnosed with cancer

mary poppins dick van dyke and julie andrews original film 1964.jpg

Disney is planning a Mary Poppins film remake

Comments

More

Watch the risqué new trailer for Fifty Shades Darker

Christian Grey is back...

by Sarah Biddlecombe
07 Dec 2016

New social platform wants to make sure nobody’s lonely this Christmas

“It’s like Tinder, but for Christmas”

by Amy Lewis
07 Dec 2016

How to buy bubbles: 8 incredible Champagnes under £30

Fantastic fizz

by Amy Swales
07 Dec 2016

Holiday hack gets you 18 days off work in a row, using just 9 days

And for our next trick we’ll turn 9 days of annual leave into 18…

by Kayleigh Dray
07 Dec 2016

Say hello to London’s first ever vegan fried chicken shop

Sounds impossible, is actually genius.

by Amy Lewis
07 Dec 2016

Revealed: the 25 best companies to work for in 2017

Time to brush up on your CV?

by Sarah Biddlecombe
07 Dec 2016

13 white wines that aren't Chardonnay, Pinot Grigio or Sauvignon Blanc

Sick of the usual suspects?

by Victoria Gray
07 Dec 2016

You need to watch this unlikely Christmas advert hit

We’re not crying, we just have something in our eye…

by Kayleigh Dray
07 Dec 2016

Your new £5 note might be worth £50,000 if it has this secret doodle

There are four notes in circulation with a tiny hidden addition

by Amy Swales
07 Dec 2016

Son shares mum's struggle to sell crafts: Twitter comes to the rescue

This may restore (some of) your faith in 2016.

by Amy Lewis
06 Dec 2016