Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation
Top

Are you one of the ‘genetically advanced’ four-hours-a-night sleepers?

audrey.JPG

Those who can get by on less than five hours of sleep have been found to carry a special gene, which experts believe negates the effects of sleep deprivation.

Ying-Hui Fu, a sleep researcher at University of California, says that those who carry the rare DEC2 gene appear to have a ‘resistance’ against the health risks which normally come with too little sleep.

“My lab uses human genetics to gain a better understanding on this topic,” she writes on Reddit. “We’ve found that sleep behaviour is heavily influenced by our genetic makeup.”

“Just like many other traits - height, weight, body shape - sleep behaviour is at least partly inherited. We discovered a mutation in the DEC2 gene that allows some people to sleep only four to six hours a night and feel completely refreshed.”

Though getting too little sleep is thought to heighten the risk of cardiovascular diseases and impaired brain function, Fu believes that the gene changes a person’s typical circadian rhythm – our natural body clock.

Getting to much sleep, in fact has the opposite effect on these people, who are left feeling groggy and out of sorts by the recommended eight hours.

Woman sleeping

Answering questions about her research on Reddit, Fu says: “From what we can tell and from what they told us, these short sleepers are pretty energetic. And we believe that they feel refreshed [after just a few hours’ sleep] since they can go on all day and be active.”

“We have not seen any health problems associated with these people. Some of our research subjects are in their 90s. On the flip side, these natural short sleepers feel, in their own words, ‘awful’ if they sleep more.”

Since there’s currently no test available for people to discover whether they do indeed have the DEC2 gene, Fu suggests listening to your body to determine just how much sleep you really need.

“The best way [to establish how much sleep you need] is to listen to your body and figure out what is the best schedule and duration for yourself.”

“For example, when you are on vacation and have no social responsibilities and no other external influences, what is your body telling you to do and how do you feel? What makes you feel the best most of the day? Although that may sound primitive, it’s still the most accurate way.”

She also encourages people to step away from sleep monitoring apps and technology, branding them largely useless.

Alarm clock

“Today’s popular wearables can only measure movement and maybe heart rate. They cannot tell you anything about the quality of your sleep,” she notes.

“To really know the quality of sleep, we have to be able to measure EEG (electroencephalogram) during sleep. Most EEG devices are difficult to use and expensive.”

So is there a quick fix to getting by on less sleep if you’re not a carrier of the super gene? According to Fu, no. And experimentation isn’t worth the health risk.

“I was one of the people who hated sleep and tried everything there was to sleep less before I started this research. Now, I wish I never messed with my sleep in my younger years.

“From what I know, it is not worth it. It will increase your chance of having health problems later on and it definitely will affect your mental vigilance.”

 

Related

woman sleeping at office work desk.jpg

Science agrees that 9am starts are torture

rexfeatures_5012161cx.jpg

Amber Rose turns the table on slut-shaming in hilarious new video

5988-062080-rt.jpg

This new classical album could cure your insomnia

101 dalmatians engagement shoot.jpg

Couple celebrates engagement with 101 Dalmatians photoshoot

yyy.jpg

The most beautiful and stylish small bedrooms

rexfeatures_4110557a.jpg

Facebook announces "dislike" style button is coming soon

book in sunset field.jpg

The Man Booker Prize shortlist is here

steven momks wedding - gift of a wedding - steve grogan photography.jpg

Strangers fund couple’s wedding after groom is diagnosed with cancer

mary poppins dick van dyke and julie andrews original film 1964.jpg

Disney is planning a Mary Poppins film remake

Comments

More

The 5 most surprising things I learnt from appearing on First Dates

What's it really like to appear on First Dates?

by Jasmine Andersson
22 Jun 2017

Rihanna just gave a heartbroken fan the best relationship advice

The pop star took time out to give a fan this brilliant tip

by Stylist
22 Jun 2017

First Dates fans respond to “shocking” mansplaining incident

“A frightened, insecure monkey hanging on to his patriarchal perch for dear life”

by Kayleigh Dray
22 Jun 2017

Golden rules of work happiness from Europe’s female tech leaders

From nap rooms to therapists and no overtime

by Anna Brech
22 Jun 2017

Hero mum has more fun at university orientation than student daughter

“I made some friends. Don’t wait up!”

by Amy Swales
22 Jun 2017

The personality trait you're most likely to inherit from your parents

How far does the apple fall from the tree?

by Nicola Colyer
22 Jun 2017

Theresa May: 600 tower blocks have similar cladding to Grenfell Tower

Thousands of homes across the country may be at risk from ‘combustible’ panelling

by Moya Crockett
22 Jun 2017

Grenfell Tower survivors to be rehomed in 'luxury' flats

by Nicola Colyer
22 Jun 2017

Australian politician expertly shuts down manterrupter

"You're not my type either mate"

by Jasmine Andersson
22 Jun 2017

Why cycling to the office could be the best thing you do all day

Skip the hellish commute, get on your bike

by Moya Crockett
22 Jun 2017