Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation

Half of US citizens want women to be forced to take their husband’s surname by law, study finds


It may be 2017, but women’s rights are well and truly under attack.

We’re constantly scrutinised over our appearance, we’re criticised over our reproductive choices, we’re fighting for autonomy at home and in the workplace, and we still earn significantly less than our male counterparts. Worse still, this rampant misogyny is becoming more and more prevalent; less than a month ago, “pussy-grabbing” Donald Trump was elected President – and one of his first acts was to officially ban US-funded groups around the world from even talking about (let alone providing) safe abortions.

Now, in a worrying new development, it has been revealed that around 50% of US citizens believe that women should be forced – by law – to take their husband’s surname.

Read more: Why we should stop shaming women who change their names after marriage

A study, which surveyed a representative national sample of 1,200 people, found that an overwhelming number of American adults think there needs to be a law in place to stop women from keeping their own last name after marriage.

However, when you delve even deeper into the study and you begin to learn why participants really want women to take the name of their husband, things become even more disturbing.

Zoe Saldana's husband took her surname when they married

Zoe Saldana's husband Marco took her surname when they married

Study author Emily Schafer – a sociology professor at Portland State University – explained: “The most common reason (approximately 50% of the cases) given by individuals who advocated women's name change was the belief that women should prioritise their marriage and their family ahead of themselves.”

Men, on the other hand, have no such expectations thrust upon them.

Read more: Why women are always blamed for acts of violence committed against them

Unsurprisingly, it was less-educated men who think that a woman who does not take her husband's last name is not committed to their marriage. Or, to put it more bluntly, is a ‘bad wife’.

The study went on to reveal that these same men believe a husband would be “more than justified” to file for divorce if his wife works “too much”, as it is a form of “neglect”. And, again, there was no vice versa; men, unlike women, are allowed - nay, encouraged - to act in their own self-interest.

It was, for the most part, less-educated men who believed women should be forced to take their husband's surname

It was, for the most part, less-educated men who believed women should be forced to take their husband's surname

Thankfully, there is no such law in place; roughly 20% of women married in recent years in the US have kept their maiden names, according to a Google Consumer Survey conducted by The Upshot. An additional 10% or so chose a third option, such as hyphenating their name or legally changing it while continuing to use their birth name professionally.

And it goes without saying that we should never judge a woman for her choices; taking your partner’s name can be every bit as valid and empowering as keeping your own.

Read more: Environmental activist Shailene Woodley on life in Trump’s America

Because there’s no ‘one size fits all’ answer, the subject of what you do with your surname after marriage is a completely personal choice – and it’s a difficult, complex, and weighty decision, not to mention one which can make people overwhelmingly defensive. For that reason, you may think it prudent to stay quiet about your choices. But, with Margaret Atwood warning of a real-life Gilead on the approach, we can’t stay silent.

Instead, we all need to stand up, raise our voices, and support one another’s right to make our own choices in all areas of life. Whether it’s our bodies, our jobs, or our names, women 100% deserve to put our own interests first – and we deserve the right to do so radically and without apology. 

Images: iStock



“Disgusting and overrated: we should all be the women Trump despises”


Donald Trump signs anti-abortion edict – in a room surrounded by men


36 of the most badass moments from the Women's March


20 soothing, beautiful songs guaranteed to help you fall asleep

An expert picks the ultimate classical music playlist

by Sarah Biddlecombe
20 Oct 2017

Puppy dog eyes are a thing and your dog makes them just for you

A study says dogs change their facial expressions when humans are looking

by Amy Swales
20 Oct 2017

Here’s how to buy a house or a flat for the princely sum of £1

It's time to enter the real-estate raffle

by Megan Murray
20 Oct 2017

Oxford University under fire for shocking lack of racial diversity

One MP called the revelations an example of “social apartheid”

by Moya Crockett
20 Oct 2017

This prosecco festival is the best way to start feeling Christmassy

Bubbles, bubbles everywhere

by Susan Devaney
20 Oct 2017

Missing your 16-25 railcard? We have good news for you

Rail bosses have taken pity on cash-strapped millennials

20 Oct 2017

This man’s response to his friend’s period while hiking is everything

“I had NOTHING on me and I was wearing shorts”

by Susan Devaney
20 Oct 2017

Why anxiety makes it harder to follow your intuition

It can have a paralysing effect on decision-making

by Anna Brech
19 Oct 2017

“Why all men must work to stamp out sexual harassment and abuse”

In wake of the Weinstein allegations, one writer argues why men need to be counted

19 Oct 2017

Rage, lust, power and warmth: how it feels to experience ‘red emotions

“I grew up being told my body was terrifying and my voice was unimportant”

by The Stylist web team
19 Oct 2017