Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation
Top

'Observational study and a piece of reportage' claims creator of 'Women Who Eat On Tubes'

wweot.jpg

If you're a fan of the internet, you'll probably be aware of the furore surrounding the Facebook group Women Who Eat On Tubes.

Last month, we discussed the site, which "celebrates" women eating while they're travelling on the London Underground, and flagged up the numerous issues we had (and still have) with it.

And today the group creator, Tony Burke, appeared on Women's Hour on Radio 4 in a bid to defend his "project".

During the discussion, which took place between Burke and student Lucy Brisbane McKay who is organising a protest against the group, there was no changing Burke's mind on how he viewed this blatant act of misogyny, which he attempted to dress up as art.

Burke described his project as being an observational study and a piece of reportage. He also said that he didn't think you should have to ask someone's permission to take a photo of them.

Although he admitted it wasn't meant to mutate into this radioactive monster it's become as he started it in 2011, for a very small group of people.

Mckay demanded why he didn't take responsibility for what the group has become. But Burke continually stood by his argument that the group was meant to be a piece of art rather than anti-women.

During the interview, Burke also claimed that the page had been taken down by Facebook.

However it turns out that's simply not the case.

A quick look this morning shows the group is still in existence, just it's now private, rather than open for all the public to see.

We contacted Facebook for a response however we were unable to get a comment on just who had shut down the group, if it was a mistake by Facebook or a member of the group's admin.

Other 'choice' quotes from Burke include his defense that the feminism angle was just one discussion, and while he empathised with it (SURE), he thought that argument was irrelevant.

As McKay quite rightly says: "Women don't want to be seen as wildlife. Especially since your art is non-consensual."

We couldn't have put it better ourselves.

Listen to the WWEOT discussion below...

Related

rexfeatures-1271440av.jpg

Women Who Eat on Tubes Facebook page: hilarious, right?

veet-hero-3.jpg

Veet apologise over hair removal advert after 'misinterpretation of its tone'

rexfeatures-3669369h.jpg

Emma Watson hits out at "dangerously unhealthy" pressure on women

use.jpg

Why women don’t need secret business rules from men

hero.jpg

"I don't deserve to be raped": women of Brazil unite in viral campaign

afghan-vote-615x330.jpg

Unprecedented number of women vote in Afghan election

Comments

More

Muslim witness of Westminster attack responds to Islamophobic trolls

A picture of the woman walking on Westminster Bridge has been shared widely

by Nicola Colyer
24 Mar 2017

Bright, beautiful and bold Easter cake inspiration

Stylish bake ideas to nick and claim as your own

by Amy Swales
24 Mar 2017

An Avengers-style Disney princesses film could be in the works

24 Mar 2017

All the new emojis set to light up our keyboards

From breastfeeding to broccoli

24 Mar 2017

There's a sex side-effect which benefits you for 48 hours, study finds

It's all about what's known as the sex "afterglow".

by Hayley Spencer
24 Mar 2017

This is how much the houses in Big Little Lies cost

Spoiler: they're VERY expensive.

by Hayley Spencer
23 Mar 2017

Scientists reveal why you need to stop flaking on plans with friends

Don't flake it 'til you make it

by Kayleigh Dray
23 Mar 2017

Revealed: the number one reason that women break up with their partner

The truth hurts

23 Mar 2017

Been zombied? There’s now a name for this confusing dating behaviour

It's time to talk about the zombies of the dating world...

23 Mar 2017

10 female anthems to share with your mum this Mother's Day

The most moving anthems about motherhood by our favourite female artists.

by Alice Vincent
23 Mar 2017