Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation

No cheers here, please: misogyny is live and kicking in a week of woeful sexism

bring it on.jpg

Ask A Feminist is Stylist.co.uk's regular column tackling issues on feminism, sexism and womanhood in a real-life, 21st-century context. Here, Harriet Hall says that the week's news events have served to highlight the limitations placed upon women by an insidious network of rules dictating what is – and isn't – "acceptable".

Feminist Harriet Hall says:

It’s been a brilliant week for women.

Beyoncé dropped her powerful album to critical acclaim; Hillary Clinton swept to four primary victories over her rival Bernie Sanders, taking her one step closer to becoming America’s first female president, and women made it onto banknotes in Scotland and the US.

But, alongside these triumphs, we’ve also seen misogyny rear its ugly head – several times over.

The most blatant example comes in the form of a flyer that the University of Washington cheerleading squad posted to their Facebook page (below) ahead of try-outs.

The poster sought to provide a little sage advice to any potential candidates. It featured a scantily-clad, tall, slim, white woman standing, arms akimbo, while arrows point to different parts of her body, reminding wannabe cheerleaders of the 'appropriate' way to appear for auditions.

Appropriateness, for cheerleaders, apparently includes being bronzed and glowing (but still white) with just enough make-up – including a ‘flattering eyeshadow’ and a ‘Girl About Town lipstick’ (whatever that means) – plus (flat) midriffs on display.

Following a social media backlash, the university pulled the poster, saying that the department had “determined that some of the details and descriptions provided were inconsistent with the values of the UW spirit program and department of athletics.”

The University of Washington is not even the first cheerleading squad to have adopted such tactics – telling women exactly how to look and present themselves when it comes to their own bodies in order to achieve success.

What’s most upsetting about the poster is the target audience: young women. Women who may already feel they must mould themselves into the patriarchal cookie cutter in order to make it.

How can anyone say feminism is redundant? Right here, now, in the 21st century, we're surrounded by everyday, casual endorsements of women as objects, reduced to the value of their appearance.


Beyonce performing at the Superbowl, 2016

This week's headlines alone illustrated that we are privy to a set of very nuanced, insular terms of behaviour. An unsaid terminology that dictates ‘acceptable’ ways of being and doing.

And when we are perceived to have broken away from these rules of engagement, we provoke comment and criticism.

When Lemonade was released over the weekend, it only took three days for Piers Morgan to say that Beyoncé “wanted to be seen as a black woman” and was “playing the race card,” as a result of which she had lost his respect.

When Clinton continued, fighting fit, in the presidential race, Donald Trump said that the only reason for her success was her vagina (let’s call it what it is) because Clinton, he announced, was also playing a card – she was playing “the woman card.”

And, when the profile of a US civil rights activist and abolitionist, Harriet Tubman, replaced that of a man on the new $20 note, people immediately complained that she wasn't smiling. It’s OK for Andrew Jackson, the president whom she replaced, to have pursed lips; for founding father, Benjamin Franklin to look stern on his $100 bill, and for Abraham Lincoln and George Washington to show no hint of a crow’s foot. But a woman?

Never mind that she endured and fought against the horror of slavery, if she thinks the can cut the mustard on the dollar, the very least she can do is give us a flash of her pearly whites.

Hilary Clinton

Hillary Clinton

That this dictation and dissection of women’s movements – of their lyrics, their words, their facial expressions and their bodies – has not come to an end in 2016 is tragic. And that the terms “woman card” or “playing the victim” even exist show they miss the point entirely.

Because, of course, there wouldn't even be a card to play if women hadn't had been subject to a history of repression, there wouldn't even be victimhood if women weren’t ever victims – of sexism, of workplace discrimination, of domestic violence and of victim-blaming.

When, I wonder, will society really start cheering for women?

Because we will keep slamming down the woman cards. We will make a full house of woman cards. We'll carry on until the day comes that acting in exactly the same manner as a man acts and being treated in exactly the way a man is treated becomes something that isn’t headline worthy – that nobody even bats an eyelid at.

Until then, move your glasses; I’m laying all my cards on the table.

Harriet Tubman (1820-1913), American Abolitionist, Portrait, circa 1885 1885

Harriet Tubman (1820-1913), American abolitionist, circa 1885

Send your feminist dilemmas to Ask a Feminist editor, harriet.hall@stylist.co.uk and she'll get one of our brilliant panel of feminists to cast a discerning eye on the issue at hand. 



Why it's time to take a stand against Bitchy Resting Face


The London mayoral candidates reveal their policies for women

hijab feminism.jpg

Why I stopped wearing the hijab

woman card.jpg

Feminists have perfect response to Trump's sexist #womancard


Kim Cattrall opens up about her battle with insomnia


Andy Murray backs Serena Williams in sexist pay gap debate

sexist semantics.jpg

The semantics of sexism: why we need to change the way we talk

Samantha Jones Sex And The City 2.jpg

Meet three women happy to be child-free by choice


“End branded feminism: it's a bloodletting of the movement”


“We should all be angry that Laura Kuenssberg needs a bodyguard”

The BBC's political editor needs protection because of misogyny, pure and simple

by Ellie Mae O’Hagan
25 Sep 2017

“Proposals for women-only carriages are ignorant and retrogressive”

"Why not create a women-only nation state and solve the problem altogether?"

by Harriet Hall
24 Aug 2017

Why Taylor Swift’s sexual assault verdict is a victory for womankind

The pop star has completely changed the narrative

by Kayleigh Dray
16 Aug 2017

“The Boots morning after pill scandal shows the bias of contraception”

Why are women burdened with the responsibility of procuring and taking contraception?

by Jasmine Andersson
26 Jul 2017

“How pathetic sexists tried to tear down the first female Doctor Who”

Misogynists are terrified of Jodie Whittaker and everything she represents

by Kayleigh Dray
17 Jul 2017

“Love Island is proof that 'nice' is feminism's secret weapon”

Harriet Minter says it’s time we dispel the myth that being a feminist means taking no prisoners.

14 Jul 2017

“Rob Kardashian’s social media rampage isn’t funny. It’s revenge porn”

The Kardashian brother posted nude photos of his ex all over Instagram. This is abuse, not entertainment

by Moya Crockett
06 Jul 2017

“Why women are all beauty pageant contestants to Donald Trump”

“I bet she treats you well”

by Anna Pollitt
28 Jun 2017

“How sexists missed the point of this pivotal Handmaid’s Tale scene”

Offred was just getting her tits out for the lads, apparently

by Kayleigh Dray
26 Jun 2017

“The Tories are bartering with women’s bodies and it’s not OK”

Will Theresa May cling to power by trading on our reproductive rights?

by Anna Brech
12 Jun 2017