Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation
Top

No cheers here, please: misogyny is live and kicking in a week of woeful sexism

bring it on.jpg

Ask A Feminist is Stylist.co.uk's regular column tackling issues on feminism, sexism and womanhood in a real-life, 21st-century context. Here, Harriet Hall says that the week's news events have served to highlight the limitations placed upon women by an insidious network of rules dictating what is – and isn't – "acceptable".

Feminist Harriet Hall says:

It’s been a brilliant week for women.

Beyoncé dropped her powerful album to critical acclaim; Hillary Clinton swept to four primary victories over her rival Bernie Sanders, taking her one step closer to becoming America’s first female president, and women made it onto banknotes in Scotland and the US.

But, alongside these triumphs, we’ve also seen misogyny rear its ugly head – several times over.

The most blatant example comes in the form of a flyer that the University of Washington cheerleading squad posted to their Facebook page (below) ahead of try-outs.

The poster sought to provide a little sage advice to any potential candidates. It featured a scantily-clad, tall, slim, white woman standing, arms akimbo, while arrows point to different parts of her body, reminding wannabe cheerleaders of the 'appropriate' way to appear for auditions.

Appropriateness, for cheerleaders, apparently includes being bronzed and glowing (but still white) with just enough make-up – including a ‘flattering eyeshadow’ and a ‘Girl About Town lipstick’ (whatever that means) – plus (flat) midriffs on display.

Following a social media backlash, the university pulled the poster, saying that the department had “determined that some of the details and descriptions provided were inconsistent with the values of the UW spirit program and department of athletics.”

The University of Washington is not even the first cheerleading squad to have adopted such tactics – telling women exactly how to look and present themselves when it comes to their own bodies in order to achieve success.

What’s most upsetting about the poster is the target audience: young women. Women who may already feel they must mould themselves into the patriarchal cookie cutter in order to make it.

How can anyone say feminism is redundant? Right here, now, in the 21st century, we're surrounded by everyday, casual endorsements of women as objects, reduced to the value of their appearance.

beyonce

Beyonce performing at the Superbowl, 2016

This week's headlines alone illustrated that we are privy to a set of very nuanced, insular terms of behaviour. An unsaid terminology that dictates ‘acceptable’ ways of being and doing.

And when we are perceived to have broken away from these rules of engagement, we provoke comment and criticism.

When Lemonade was released over the weekend, it only took three days for Piers Morgan to say that Beyoncé “wanted to be seen as a black woman” and was “playing the race card,” as a result of which she had lost his respect.

When Clinton continued, fighting fit, in the presidential race, Donald Trump said that the only reason for her success was her vagina (let’s call it what it is) because Clinton, he announced, was also playing a card – she was playing “the woman card.”

And, when the profile of a US civil rights activist and abolitionist, Harriet Tubman, replaced that of a man on the new $20 note, people immediately complained that she wasn't smiling. It’s OK for Andrew Jackson, the president whom she replaced, to have pursed lips; for founding father, Benjamin Franklin to look stern on his $100 bill, and for Abraham Lincoln and George Washington to show no hint of a crow’s foot. But a woman?

Never mind that she endured and fought against the horror of slavery, if she thinks the can cut the mustard on the dollar, the very least she can do is give us a flash of her pearly whites.

Hilary Clinton

Hillary Clinton

That this dictation and dissection of women’s movements – of their lyrics, their words, their facial expressions and their bodies – has not come to an end in 2016 is tragic. And that the terms “woman card” or “playing the victim” even exist show they miss the point entirely.

Because, of course, there wouldn't even be a card to play if women hadn't had been subject to a history of repression, there wouldn't even be victimhood if women weren’t ever victims – of sexism, of workplace discrimination, of domestic violence and of victim-blaming.

When, I wonder, will society really start cheering for women?

Because we will keep slamming down the woman cards. We will make a full house of woman cards. We'll carry on until the day comes that acting in exactly the same manner as a man acts and being treated in exactly the way a man is treated becomes something that isn’t headline worthy – that nobody even bats an eyelid at.

Until then, move your glasses; I’m laying all my cards on the table.

Harriet Tubman (1820-1913), American Abolitionist, Portrait, circa 1885 1885

Harriet Tubman (1820-1913), American abolitionist, circa 1885

Send your feminist dilemmas to Ask a Feminist editor, harriet.hall@stylist.co.uk and she'll get one of our brilliant panel of feminists to cast a discerning eye on the issue at hand. 

Related

smiling.jpg

Why it's time to take a stand against Bitchy Resting Face

london.jpg

The London mayoral candidates reveal their policies for women

hijab feminism.jpg

Why I stopped wearing the hijab

woman card.jpg

Feminists have perfect response to Trump's sexist #womancard

kc.jpg

Kim Cattrall opens up about her battle with insomnia

GettyImages-454030010.jpg

Andy Murray backs Serena Williams in sexist pay gap debate

sexist semantics.jpg

The semantics of sexism: why we need to change the way we talk

Samantha Jones Sex And The City 2.jpg

Meet three women happy to be child-free by choice

feminism.jpg

“End branded feminism: it's a bloodletting of the movement”

Comments

More

“Why are women such doormats when it comes to friendship?”

"We still have some crazy idea that society ‘rewards’ women who are nice to each other"

by The Stylist web team
01 Dec 2016

Why Trump’s win proves the feminist fight must go on

“Millions voted to show that that misogyny doesn’t matter”

by The Stylist web team
10 Nov 2016

An open letter to what should have been the first female US leader

Sarah Ditum imagines writing to the first female president of the United States.

by The Stylist web team
09 Nov 2016

“Be brave, be fearless”: a letter to my daughter on President Trump

“Dear girl, an accident of chromosomes has put you on the losing team”

by The Stylist web team
09 Nov 2016

Why feminism is the real winner in this extraordinary US election

On November 8th, here's why feminists should all be celebrating

by The Stylist web team
03 Nov 2016

How to be a nasty woman: Stylist's 9 step guide

A must-read for all women considering themselves 'good girls'

by Harriet Hall
21 Oct 2016

“Criminalising purchase would be a danger to sex workers”

...argues sex worker and activist, Molly Smith

by The Stylist web team
20 Oct 2016

“Unladylike” Gigi and why women always get blamed for acts of violence

The model was attacked by a stranger - so why are we blaming her?

by Kayleigh Dray
23 Sep 2016

“Why our stale working culture feeds a gaping gender pay gap"

No flexibility, no part-time: our model of work is still based on the assumption of the male breadwinner

24 Aug 2016

“Women winning medals? Let’s just focus on their looks!”

Why this drip-feed of sexist Olympics coverage has got to stop

16 Aug 2016