Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation
Top

“Employers need to be as blind as possible” Lucy Mangan on the danger of bias in the workplace

iStock_73532345_MEDIUM.jpg

Obviously, I am completely free of prejudice. Except for hating men with long hair, obviously. And anyone with a devil dog. And devil dogs themselves. Because they clearly are innately savage. Just look at their faces. I also have to dig deep to overcome certain accents. Of course I don’t have one myself.

You, I know, are equally splendidly untainted by such irrationality.

Except of course, we’re not. Bias runs deep. We make judgments all the time, consciously and unconsciously. It is almost impossible to recognise or control for it without outside help. Most of us, fortunately, are not in positions where our prejudices can do direct harm (though we are polluting, in our own small and large ways, the stream of everyday life – have a good day, now, y’all!) but some are. And they need to be stopped.

Which is why I am making an honourable exception this week to a long-held opinion. As regular readers of this column will know, short of finding myself alone on a cliff top with him, ideally overlooking some treacherously sharp rocks below in a stiff wind that could make anything inopportune seem like an awful, tragic accident – I am not one to get behind David Cameron.

But in the wake of his keynote speech in Manchester about ending job discrimination, a slew of big employers have agreed to embrace a name-blind application process to try and reduce the problem of people recruiting – advertently or inadvertently – in their own image, race-, gender-, class- and anything else your moniker might give away-wise. “Steven and Stephen,” a posh friend of mine once told me as authoritatively as only privately schooled young men can, “are totally different people.” Who knew? Apart from a disproportionate number of the people with the power to hire you, of course.

Virgin Money, HSBC and KPMG have all signed up to the deal, while Deloitte even goes a bit further – it blanks out applicants’ school and university details too. That’s hardcore but it encourages us to look even further at what really counts as relevant to how well you are suited to a job. Looked at with clear eyes, ethnicity, sexuality, age, disability and gender (unless you’re applying to be a wetnurse or sperm donor or something of course. That’s a more basic form-filling exercise. Two boxes, maximum – tick one. Congratulations! You are now gainfully employed), all turn to dust.

Consciously, most employers know that. I have to believe they do, anyway, otherwise I will be left with no choice but to raze the entire human experiment to the ground. But unconsciously? No. We need help. Breaking out of a cycle, breaking free of a company/institutional norm is rarely possible without a firm boot up the backside. Internalised prejudice is invisible even to its harbourer. I always think of myself at primary school, refusing to be a doctor in a game because “girls couldn’t be doctors”. The fact that my own mother was a doctor was not enough to give the lie to what I had absorbed by osmosis elsewhere.

Employers need to be as blind as possible for as long as possible in all interviewing processes, and those who say they are completely without prejudice need it most of all. So good on you, Deloitte et al. Congratulations on your step into enlightened darkness.


Photography: Ellis Parrinder

Related

SWNS_BARBER_ROW_05 (1).jpg

Barbershop throws out customer because she's a woman

cariss.JPG

Six-year-old girl is finally allowed to wear trousers to school

flats cannes.jpg

Susan Sarandon wearing flats on the red carpet is a big win for women

high heels office sent home.jpg

Woman is sent home from work for not wearing high heels

bring it on.jpg

No cheers here, please: a week of woeful sexism

iStock_000082626905_Large.jpg

“London is the most fat-shaming place I've ever been”, says US author

vote.jpg

Why feminists should vote ‘remain’ in the EU referendum

iStock_000067502817_Large.jpg

Lucy Mangan on the discrimination at the heart of the gender pay gap

cover_rt.jpg

The dad dilemma: do men really have it all?

More

Lucy Mangan: “Apathy is domestic violence's biggest ally”

We shouldn't as why women stay - we should ask how it came to be that it was impossible for them to leave

by Lucy Mangan
01 Aug 2017

Lucy Mangan: we should “think twice” before considering porn harmless

“Porn has become normalised, placed almost beyond criticism by its sheer prevalence”

by Lucy Mangan
25 Jul 2017

Lucy Mangan is defending our right to platonic friendships

Our columnist on the infuriating mistrust a one-on-one dinner with a friend provokes

by Lucy Mangan
11 Jul 2017

Lucy Mangan: being ambitious isn’t for everyone

"I cannot live at full stretch"

by Lucy Mangan
08 Jun 2017

Lucy Mangan is exhausted by the “age of extremes”

“Can’t we all just agree to meet half-way?”

by Lucy Mangan
17 May 2017

Lucy Mangan: “Why I regret losing my religion”

"The older I get and the more chaotic the world gets, the more I wish I could trust in a higher power."

by Lucy Mangan
03 May 2017

Lucy Mangan exposes the dangers of parental point scoring

“Enough of this parent worship”

by Lucy Mangan
01 May 2017

“Family planning: the equality question”

Lucy Mangan on the burden of contraception

by Lucy Mangan
01 Apr 2017

Lucy Mangan on why feeling beautiful starts with your thoughts

“Erase the ugly voices in your head”

by Lucy Mangan
01 Apr 2017

“A step-by-step guide to sexism”: Lucy Mangan responds to ‘Legs-it’

You are a lady and you have legs. Use them to kick ass.

by Lucy Mangan
01 Apr 2017