Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation

“Employers need to be as blind as possible” Lucy Mangan on the danger of bias in the workplace


Obviously, I am completely free of prejudice. Except for hating men with long hair, obviously. And anyone with a devil dog. And devil dogs themselves. Because they clearly are innately savage. Just look at their faces. I also have to dig deep to overcome certain accents. Of course I don’t have one myself.

You, I know, are equally splendidly untainted by such irrationality.

Except of course, we’re not. Bias runs deep. We make judgments all the time, consciously and unconsciously. It is almost impossible to recognise or control for it without outside help. Most of us, fortunately, are not in positions where our prejudices can do direct harm (though we are polluting, in our own small and large ways, the stream of everyday life – have a good day, now, y’all!) but some are. And they need to be stopped.

Which is why I am making an honourable exception this week to a long-held opinion. As regular readers of this column will know, short of finding myself alone on a cliff top with him, ideally overlooking some treacherously sharp rocks below in a stiff wind that could make anything inopportune seem like an awful, tragic accident – I am not one to get behind David Cameron.

But in the wake of his keynote speech in Manchester about ending job discrimination, a slew of big employers have agreed to embrace a name-blind application process to try and reduce the problem of people recruiting – advertently or inadvertently – in their own image, race-, gender-, class- and anything else your moniker might give away-wise. “Steven and Stephen,” a posh friend of mine once told me as authoritatively as only privately schooled young men can, “are totally different people.” Who knew? Apart from a disproportionate number of the people with the power to hire you, of course.

Virgin Money, HSBC and KPMG have all signed up to the deal, while Deloitte even goes a bit further – it blanks out applicants’ school and university details too. That’s hardcore but it encourages us to look even further at what really counts as relevant to how well you are suited to a job. Looked at with clear eyes, ethnicity, sexuality, age, disability and gender (unless you’re applying to be a wetnurse or sperm donor or something of course. That’s a more basic form-filling exercise. Two boxes, maximum – tick one. Congratulations! You are now gainfully employed), all turn to dust.

Consciously, most employers know that. I have to believe they do, anyway, otherwise I will be left with no choice but to raze the entire human experiment to the ground. But unconsciously? No. We need help. Breaking out of a cycle, breaking free of a company/institutional norm is rarely possible without a firm boot up the backside. Internalised prejudice is invisible even to its harbourer. I always think of myself at primary school, refusing to be a doctor in a game because “girls couldn’t be doctors”. The fact that my own mother was a doctor was not enough to give the lie to what I had absorbed by osmosis elsewhere.

Employers need to be as blind as possible for as long as possible in all interviewing processes, and those who say they are completely without prejudice need it most of all. So good on you, Deloitte et al. Congratulations on your step into enlightened darkness.

Photography: Ellis Parrinder


SWNS_BARBER_ROW_05 (1).jpg

Barbershop throws out customer because she's a woman


Six-year-old girl is finally allowed to wear trousers to school

flats cannes.jpg

Susan Sarandon wearing flats on the red carpet is a big win for women

high heels office sent home.jpg

Woman is sent home from work for not wearing high heels

bring it on.jpg

No cheers here, please: a week of woeful sexism


“London is the most fat-shaming place I've ever been”, says US author


Why feminists should vote ‘remain’ in the EU referendum


Lucy Mangan on the discrimination at the heart of the gender pay gap


The dad dilemma: do men really have it all?



“If you need me, I’ll be in the woods”

Lucy Mangan on the joy of being alone

by Lucy Mangan
01 Mar 2017

Lucy Mangan explains how a tragic event can actually unite us all

“Amidst polarising opinion, we are still united”

by Lucy Mangan
01 Mar 2017

“Brace yourself – it’s time we had the baby chat”

Lucy Mangan on why it’s fine to not want children

by Lucy Mangan
01 Mar 2017

“You can take your heels and...”

Lucy Mangan on the high heels debate

by Lucy Mangan
01 Mar 2017

“All hail the big cosmetic surgery U-turn”

Lucy Mangan on a welcome change in the fashion and beauty industry

by Lucy Mangan
03 Feb 2017

“Without divorce, marriage is doomed”

Lucy Mangan on why the world needs divorce

by Lucy Mangan
01 Feb 2017

Lucy Mangan on the art of saving money

“In debt? Allow me to confiscate your cards”

by Lucy Mangan
15 Jan 2017

Lucy Mangan guides us into the New Year

“So here it is! 2017: a user’s manual”

by Lucy Mangan
01 Jan 2017

Lucy Mangan doles out her annual awards

“And the award for the worst year ever goes to...”

by Lucy Mangan
09 Dec 2016

Lucy Mangan on the hope in the abuse headlines

“The silence that protects people who do terrible things is breaking down”

by Lucy Mangan
05 Dec 2016