Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation

“You can take your heels and...” Lucy Mangan on the high heels debate


I honestly thought more than 10 MPs would turn up to the Westminster Hall debate about high heels in the workplace last week, even if they only went for curiosity’s sake or to kill some of the otherwise dead hours of doing their parliamentary duty. In the event, the turn-out was p*sspoor. Still, what we lose in rigorous discussion and forward legislative motion we gain in hope.

You remember, I’m sure, the news that prompted the debate over banning mandatory corporate dress codes. Receptionist Nicola Thorp was sent home by her employer after she refused to wear high heels to work. She launched a petition entitled ‘Make it illegal for a company to require women to wear high heels at work’ that quickly got over 150,000 signatures and prompted the Petitions and Women and Equalities committees to investigate sexist dress codes in the workplace and call for a review of the rules covering them.

The resulting debate cited evidence gathered by the committees that will probably come as no surprise to those of us who have ever set foot in an office or worked in a shop, but which is still pretty astonishing when you hear it all at once. There’s the firm that requires female staff to wear make-up and even provides a colour chart of acceptable nail polish shades. The firm that told off a black woman for wearing black tights instead of “flesh coloured”. The retailer who told female staff to wear extra lipstick and open their blouses a bit more at Christmas so that it would hit seasonal targets.

We could all, I’m sure, add our own anecdotes to this. I was once fired from a temp job for my insistence on wearing trousers instead of a skirt while working at the (freezing) reception desk. To my everlasting regret I just slunk away (I was in my early 20s and still easily intimidated), but 15 years on I now go shopping with girlfriends and watch, mouth agape, as they try and find just the right shift dress for work. Not too short. Not too long. Not ‘booby’ but not sexless. A matching cardigan, not to accommodate different temperatures but different clients. Some can cope with women having bare arms, you see, and some can’t. Then come the different height heels according to the exact result those calculations have produced. Two inches if the dress is a little bit short or a little bit booby. Four if it’s erring the other way. Three if you’re tall or have a really long day ahead of you. Never once do I hear anything about comfort or how the outfit will facilitate getting their jobs done.

I’m sure the low turnout at the parliamentary debate was down to how frivolous it sounded – high heels, yay or nay? – but of course it’s not. So much is enshrined in how we dress and the rules that are laid down about it. Imagine being the black woman who was told to change her black tights because they weren’t flesh- coloured. What erasure. Imagine being told to look more sexually available so that a store can hit central targets. What humiliation. Imagine being expected to do an eight hour shift standing on the balls of your feet and two thin sticks. What madness.

This was a debate worth having among more than 10 MPs. And it is one that we must keep having among ourselves. It is technically already illegal to have different dress codes for men and women (although the penalties are so trifling you’d be better off making code enforcers stand in stilettoes for an hour instead), so don’t be cowed. Let’s slip on our flats en masse, and stand tall.



Piers Morgan apologises to women after being forced to wear high heels


Sexist office dress codes must be addressed, say MPs


“Heels aren’t anti-feminist”: Jimmy Choo founder speaks out


Lucy Mangan: “Apathy is domestic violence's biggest ally”

We shouldn't as why women stay - we should ask how it came to be that it was impossible for them to leave

by Lucy Mangan
01 Aug 2017

Lucy Mangan: we should “think twice” before considering porn harmless

“Porn has become normalised, placed almost beyond criticism by its sheer prevalence”

by Lucy Mangan
25 Jul 2017

Lucy Mangan is defending our right to platonic friendships

Our columnist on the infuriating mistrust a one-on-one dinner with a friend provokes

by Lucy Mangan
11 Jul 2017

Lucy Mangan: being ambitious isn’t for everyone

"I cannot live at full stretch"

by Lucy Mangan
08 Jun 2017

Lucy Mangan is exhausted by the “age of extremes”

“Can’t we all just agree to meet half-way?”

by Lucy Mangan
17 May 2017

Lucy Mangan: “Why I regret losing my religion”

"The older I get and the more chaotic the world gets, the more I wish I could trust in a higher power."

by Lucy Mangan
03 May 2017

Lucy Mangan exposes the dangers of parental point scoring

“Enough of this parent worship”

by Lucy Mangan
01 May 2017

“Family planning: the equality question”

Lucy Mangan on the burden of contraception

by Lucy Mangan
01 Apr 2017

Lucy Mangan on why feeling beautiful starts with your thoughts

“Erase the ugly voices in your head”

by Lucy Mangan
01 Apr 2017

“A step-by-step guide to sexism”: Lucy Mangan responds to ‘Legs-it’

You are a lady and you have legs. Use them to kick ass.

by Lucy Mangan
01 Apr 2017