Life

No-fault divorce: a new bill is working its way through parliament

Posted by
Hollie Richardson
Published
No fault divorce in UK

Changes to UK divorce law could make proceedings easier, cheaper and, ultimately, fairer.

Currently, in order to get a divorce in the UK, one spouse has to allege adultery, unreasonable behaviour or desertion has taken place. But it doesn’t allow a couple to undergo proceedings because their marriage simply hasn’t worked out. This, arguably, perpetuates the so-called “blame game” stigma of divorce. And it stops people from leaving unhappy marriages.

You may also like

This landmark divorce case could change things for working women who start a family

In 2018, Tini Owen’s high-profile case sparked a debate around divorce law. She wanted to divorce her husband of 40 years because she was “desperately unhappy” – but he disagreed with her decision. The law stated she could only obtain a divorce by living apart from him for five years. The Supreme Court rejected her appeal.

But now, a new “no-fault” divorce bill is working its way through parliament in order to make proceedings easier and, ultimately, fairer. Under the proposed law, a person will only have to state that the marriage has broken down irretrievably. The bill passed its first hurdle in the Commons on Monday 8 June by winning the backing of the majority of MPs by 231 to 16.

You may also like

“What getting divorced before I turned 30 taught me about marriage and relationships”

The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, which has been passed by the House of Lords, also removes the possibility of contesting the decision to divorce. Right now, a person wishing to obtain a divorce without the consent of their spouse must live apart from them for five years. However, some divorce proceedings will still be challengeable on grounds including fraud and coercion.

divorce uk
No fault divorces could soon make proceedings easier and fairer for people in unhappy marriages.

And the bill introduces a new option, which allows couples to jointly apply for a divorce, where the decision to separate is a mutual one. It also replaces the terms “decree nisi” and “decree absolute” with “conditional order” and “final order”. “Petitioners” will also become “applicants”.

Under the new proposals, there must be a minimum six-month period between the lodging of a petition to the divorce being made final.

You may also like

Do we really need to get married to have a committed relationship?

Justice Secretary Robert Buckland opened Monday’s debate on the bill by explaining how the changes seeks to make separation “less traumatic”.

He told MPs: “No-one sets out thinking that their marriage is going to end, no-one wants their marriage to break down, none of us are therefore indifferent when a couple’s lifelong commitment has sadly deteriorated… It is a very sad circumstance but the law, I believe, should reduce conflict when it arises… Where divorce is inevitable, this bill seeks to make the legal process less painful.”

However, some MPs – Sir Desmond Swayne, Sir John Hayes and Fiona Bruce – have written an open letter to The Telegraph to say the changes are badly timed due to the current strain on marriages during lockdown. They also urge the government to focus on helping couples reconcile through counselling instead of “undermining the commitment of marriage”.

You may also like

Anna Faris on why the social media reaction to her divorce made her “angry”

Explaining what the changes would truly mean for people, Emma Wilders-Pratt Family Partner at Trethowans law firm tells Stylist: “I have been a family solicitor for 20 years and throughout my time in private practice I have watched with great sadness how a litigious divorce can cause such emotional turmoil, not only to the couple, but the family unit.

“Family breakdown happens and should not be frowned upon. What is paramount is that, when separation occurs, couples are encouraged to do so in a conciliatory way. In doing so, both parties can leave the marriage with their dignity intact and can develop a positive post separation relationship, which will have a profoundly positive effect on their children.

“As the law currently stands, unless you wait two years post separation, you can only issue divorce proceedings if there has been an adultery, or you rely on the other’s unreasonable behaviour.

“As a member of Resolution, I strive to ensure my clients deal with their divorce in a conciliatory way. This can be immensely difficult if the first thing they have to do is cite the other’s unreasonable behaviour, when all they require is a divorce that can simply rely on the fact their marriage has broken down irretrievably. This is why I and many of my colleagues and clients champion the introduction of the new no fault divorce procedure due to come into force.”

A second reading is being debated today (Tuesday 9 June), Stylist will keep you updated on the status of the bill.

Sign up to our daily email for a curated edit of the latest news and must-read features from Stylist, so you’ll never miss out on the conversation again.

Images: Getty

Topics

Share this article

Author

Hollie Richardson

Hollie is a digital writer at Stylist.co.uk, mainly covering the daily news on women’s issues, politics, celebrities and entertainment. She also keeps an ear out for the best podcast episodes to share with readers. Oh, and don’t even get her started on Outlander…